Z Cubed Music1 week ago I think you guys need a better title for this video & some more hashtags, please promote yourselves better because this work needs to get headlines and more attention. REPLY
Steve Trueblue11 hours ago Maybe less attention is better. More chance of survival to commercial status. Wonder if the Pentagon is across this? They can disappear patents. Weapons could get a whole lot worse. LOL. Electric Aeroplanes? Electric Cruise missiles ? Faster ways to Mars ? REPLY
Highlighted replyZ Cubed Music7 hours ago@Steve Trueblue They already said years ago they are working directly with the DOD and Pentagon, and I think all parties want to see this technology upgrade to the next level, before any patents get buried. As you noted, this is more a proof of concept rather than a commercially viable product, and we need as many scientists as possible experimenting and discussing these principles to advance the tech and expand on the theories behind it so we can edge EU into mainstream. That means we need as much attention as humanly possible on this tech. Like you say it could have huge implications on the battery market and while all these companies are investing billions into R&D for that, what better time to revolutionize the whole game? 1 REPLY
Steve Trueblue4 minutes ago (edited)@Z Cubed Music Am praying you are right, though, I fear as the fossil fuel industry sees these developments as a threat they will do their usual snuff job. There seems to be a needed delicate balance and timing, between shouting it from the rooftops after its finally “born” commercially, in multiple places, and keeping it quiet while it slowly grows thru nascency to the point where a cargo container can produce a megawatt at an affordable price and they can be ordered on Amazon. And its no big deal. Fossil fuel money would try to own and control this. It’s their only chance of coexisting with the new idea. But reading down the comments here people point out these things have all been promised since the 60s but never materialised. 2014 Lockheed Martin had an electric jet flying. The container producing a megawatt was promised in the 60s by a few companies. Disclosure Man Dr Steven Greer says innovation’s greatest enemy is the fossil fuel status quo. I wonder if this technology could be gifted to a rogue state to ensure that other nations would adopt it to retain parity. Say Iran or north Korea. These states seem very hard to control. Which may be what’s needed. REPLY
Icrewhelos O1 week agoI just want to know if this can be used to create Rocket Engine thrust.5REPLYHide 4 replies
Kevin T1 week agoshort answer is yes4REPLY
Guillermo1 week agohttps://aip.scitation.org/doi/full/10.1063/5.00058141 REPLY
Electric rocket engine using a 1000 Watt microwave oven magnetron
Notably it was done in China.
jcoghill21 week ago (edited) You’ve done what projects around the globe for decades have tried to do and are still failing. Self containing plasma! 90% of the world has no idea what this achievement means and the other 10% can only imagine. Please don’t let this idea die. You guys are treading on the territory of some very powerful people. Namely the power companies of the world. They’ll come in and buy you out and stash your idea on a shelf for 40 years so they can still make a buck or manipulate the events in your lives till you go out of business like they did to Preston Tucker. Show less (Preston Tucker produced a luxury affordable car in 1948 with disc brakes, power steering, air-conditioning an internal heater standard, auto transmission and he was destroyed financially by Detroit. He was prevented from buying steel sheet metal and vital parts) Alternatively the other manufacturers could have competed with better cars. But they didn’t. They vigorously defended their monopoly Status quo by destroying the industry newcomer)
David Socha1 week ago Men in Black are Coming! ?????????REPLY
Joe Deglman1 week agoLockheed-Martin filed a patent in 2014 for a similar device, “hydrogen reactor,” and also to be used to propel aircraft. It seems they may have had a proto-type aircraft capable of flight in 2014. They claimed they would have a turnkey product capable of powering cities of 50,000, that could fit into a dump truck sized vehicle by 2019, capable of using regular hydrogen. So far it seems there has been no product on the market. REPLY
eugenerk1 week agoFrom their website: “the SAFIRE team does not endorse or support any particular theory or model for what is happening inside the chamber, or inside other group’s chambers. We focus on refining our process to achieve predictable results.” i.e. they have no idea of what they’re doing, but are playing with the nobs and the valves to see if something interesting happens. Maybe don’t invest all of your money just yet.REPLYHide reply
Steve Trueblue11 hours ago They are NOT educating business rivals ! You get it ? Second rule of business. Don’t educate other people.
Paul Morgant6 days ago At last count, there are more than a dozen patented nuclear waste remediation methods. Most are based on ZIPP fusion. This is MIT showcasing KNOWN, OLD technology. REPLY
Tsidqenu1 week agoThis is a well-known criticism of the project. Aureon do themselves no favours by having only 2 papers on SAFIRE. Even digging in their released publications exposes little in the way of solid data. I guess they want to keep it under wraps because there’s a potential $1,000,000,000,000 riding on it.4 REPLY
Marshall Deasy1 week ago They are claiming to generate energy from this reactor. The way it is presented in the video implies nuclear energy generation. It seems disingenuous to me.
The SAFIRE Project 1 week ago Hi Marshall, Thanks for posting your concerns. We have no evidence there is any “over unity” – the term would imply “something for nothing”. Personally, I don’t have any evidence there is any “over unity” occurring anywhere in nature. I could be wrong… it wouldn’t be the first time. However, energy transformation of one state to another is well documented. Elemental Transmutation occurs in fission and fusion reactors all the time. It is the binding energies that ultimately result in a thermal response. You need a fuel – a general term. The fuel in this case is not molecular like gasoline, it’s nuclear. The difference – SAFIRE produces its own powerful stable electromagnetic containment fields. It may be analogous to – harvesting the potential energy during elemental transmutation. It is important to note transmutation responses can be endothermic and exothermic it all depends on where you are in the periodic table. We work very hard to be as accurate in our narrative so no one gains an impression that we are claiming something we are not. Show less 14 likes REPLY
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
